Darts and Laurels
subscribe  |    email  |    print
To William Marshall

Of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Marshall wrote an op-ed in the July 5 Washington Post complaining about “weapons in space.” Not only was his timing poor — the article ran the day after North Korea launched, with “mixed success,” its latest test of the Taepodong II intercontinental ballistic missile — but pretending that space is not already a ground of military competition is no argument for a sensible American space policy. The real question is how to shape that competition in ways that protect the interests of the United States and its allies. Marshall is right to worry about ground-based anti-satellite weapons; but it’s nearly certain that China and others already possess such systems. Space is the international commons of the 21st century, as the open oceans have been the commons in the past. There will be a fight for space power; the question is how the United States deals with that fight.

  email  |    print  |    continue the debate
YOUR VIEWS
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Read our letters to the editor.
SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Tell us what you think.
HOW TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE TO AFJ
Interested in writing an opinion piece for the magazine? Read our guidelines
Subscribe  |  Renew  |  Customer Service  |  Advertising  |  Contact Us
For inquiries about reproduction or distribution of any materials contained herein, please click here.
Gannett
All content © 2012, Armed Forces Journal