Darts and Laurels
subscribe  |    email  |    print
Fuel folly

TO HOUSE REPUBLICANS for attempting to shut down the Navy’s biofuel efforts. By forbidding DoD to make or buy any alternative fuel that costs more than a “traditional” fossil fuel, the House Armed Services Committee knocks the wind out of Navy Secretary Ray Mabus’ attempt to ease his service’s — and by extension, the U.S. military’s — dependence on imported energy.

To be sure, the algae- and grease-based fuel loadout for this summer’s Great Green Fleet exercise will cost four times as much as its petroleum-based equivalent. The bill comes to $15 million. That’s a pittance in DoD budget terms, and a good investment in a diversified fuel stream. As with any nascent technology, the price of biofuel will come down — if there is a customer to support it.

The HASC language must still survive the rest of the 2013 budget process; let’s hope someone along the way realizes how shortsighted this move would be.

  email  |    print  |    continue the debate
YOUR VIEWS
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Read our letters to the editor.
SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Tell us what you think.
HOW TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE TO AFJ
Interested in writing an opinion piece for the magazine? Read our guidelines
Subscribe  |  Renew  |  Customer Service  |  Advertising  |  Contact Us
For inquiries about reproduction or distribution of any materials contained herein, please click here.
Gannett
All content © 2013, Armed Forces Journal