Armed Forces Journal Forums  

Go Back   Armed Forces Journal Forums > Perspectives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2008, 04:41 AM
Administrator Administrator is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 0
Default The ‘who’ question

The many defense reviews of the post-Cold-War era, beginning with the first Bush administration’s “Base Force” plan, have couched themselves in the language of “capabilities” rather than threats. It’s been as if security strategy in the 21st century was all about us, self-referential. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff back then, Gen. Colin Powell, summarized the Base Force as a “sign that says, ‘Superpower lives here.’” And so much of the enthusiasm for defense “transformation” captured the idea that the U.S. armed forces — “proved” to be the most dominant on the planet if not in human history by the “rapid, decisive” operations of the 1990s — could become so superior that no enemy would dare risk a confrontation. “Don’t even think about it!” was the message we hoped to transmit.

http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2005/12/1241321
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.