Armed Forces Journal Forums  

Go Back   Armed Forces Journal Forums > Archived Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Archived Discussions Read-only conversations

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:55 PM
Administrator Administrator is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 0
Default The big gamble

Like no other military service in history, the Navy is betting a very large — and expensive — chunk of its future fleet on untested technologies and practices. Large destroyers built to a hull design no one has ridden. Aircraft carriers that will launch their planes by a method yet to launch an aircraft. Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) operated in ways entirely new to any navy.

http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2008/03/3348591
  #2  
Old 03-22-2008, 10:29 PM
The Universal Curmudgeon The Universal Curmudgeon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Wet Coast
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
Like no other military service in history, the Navy is betting a very large — and expensive — chunk of its future fleet on untested technologies and practices. Large destroyers built to a hull design no one has ridden. Aircraft carriers that will launch their planes by a method yet to launch an aircraft. Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) operated in ways entirely new to any navy.http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2008/03/3348591
At the risk of sounding like a broken record on the DDG 1000 class vessels, consider the following:

1. LENGTH
a. RMS Graf Spee - 610'
b. USS DDG 1000 - 600'
2. BEAM
a. RMS Graf Spee - 71.0'
b. USS DDG 1000 - 80.7'
3. SPEED
a. RMS Graf Spee - 28.5 Kt
b. USS DDG 1000 - 30 Kt
4. CRUISING RANGE
a. RMS Graf Spee - 12,500 Nm
b. USS DDG 1000 - 6,000 Nm
5. CREW
a. RMS Graf Spee - 1,075
b. USS DDG 1000 - 150
6. GUNNERY RANGE
a. RMS Graf Spee - 40 mi
b. USS DDG 1000 - 100 mi (projected) 59 mi (actual)
7. ARMAMENT
a. RMS Graf Spee -
i. 6 × 280 mm (11 inch)
720 rounds
ii. 8 × 150 mm (5.9 inch)
1,000 rounds
iii. 6 × 105 mm (4.1 inch)
3,000 rounds
iv. 8 × 37 mm
v. 10 × 20 mm
vi. 8 × 533 mm (21 inch) torpedo tubes
b. USS DDG 1000 -
i. 2 x 155mm Advanced Gun System
920 - 155mm Long Range Land Attack Projectile
[600 Threshold / 1200 Objective]
ii. 80 x PVLS cells
8. ARMOUR
a. RMS Graf Spee -
i. Turret Face - 160mm
ii. Belt - 80mm
iii. Deck - 40mm
b. USS DDG 1000 - ???

9. COST (2007 US$)
a. RMS Graf Spee
US$ 303,061,000
b. USS DDG 1000
US$1,500,000,000 (hopefully)
US$2,500,000,000 (probably)
Considering the advances in the technology of propulsion, armour, gunnery, ammunition, and artillery - it looks like the USN would be better off building a whole bunch of modernized Graf Spees - even if they cost double the inflation adjusted price of the original.

Besides they would look really KEEN compared to the rather frumpy looking DDG 1000s.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.