Armed Forces Journal Forums  

Go Back   Armed Forces Journal Forums > Archived Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Archived Discussions Read-only conversations

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2008, 03:27 PM
Administrator Administrator is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 0
Default Think small

The Navy has a relatively large number of surface combatants capable of conducting a wide range of missions in a high-intensity conflict. However, the Navy lacks adequate capabilities to operate effectively in the littorals, in particular in enclosed and semi-enclosed seas (popularly called “narrow seas”).

http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2008/07/3548183
  #2  
Old 07-15-2008, 12:38 PM
The Universal Curmudgeon The Universal Curmudgeon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Wet Coast
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
The Navy has a relatively large number of surface combatants capable of conducting a wide range of missions in a high-intensity conflict. However, the Navy lacks adequate capabilities to operate effectively in the littorals, in particular in enclosed and semi-enclosed seas (popularly called “narrow seas”).
Professor Comer makes some good points.

I wonder if the USN would be interested in buying some WWII "C" Class RCN destroyers (since those appear to match the technical specifications that he says are required)?
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.